Bruen requires judges to focus solely on whether a law comports with a historical understanding of the Second Amendment. The new test the Supreme Court adopted in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. The justices are scheduled to discuss in private on Thursday whether to hear the case in what will be the first real test of how broadly the court’s conservative majority wants its 2022 ruling to be interpreted. Now the issue is back on the Supreme Court’s doorstep again, with the Biden administration asking the court to reverse the lower court ruling that invalidated the federal law barring people subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. It has also led to blue states passing a new wave of gun laws in the hope that they will not fall foul of the Supreme Court’s rationale. Other judges have upheld gun restrictions, creating divisions on the law across the country. The decision by the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority has led to a flurry of challenges to long-standing laws - both federal and state - and prompted some judges to find they are unlawful under the new standard. And a third found that the federal law prohibiting people under 21 from owning firearms is unlawful.Īll of these recent rulings by lower federal courts are the product of court decisions striking blows against long-standing federal gun restrictions that were issued by lower court judges in the past year after the Supreme Court, in a sweeping ruling, expanded gun rights by finding for the first time that the Constitution’s Second Amendment right to bear arms extends outside the home.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |